Monday, April 4, 2011

Adam - the first Human or first Homo Sapien?

As a Muslim my belief in the Quran is unshakeable, which is perhaps natural since each religion holds its holy book in complete reverence. That is what belief in religion is all about, you cannot be part of a religion and not believe in what constitutes its foundation. Biblical scholars have for years used archaeology as a means of discovering and proving the events narrated in the Bible. However as most Biblical scholars agree, since the Bible was compiled over several years and most of the chapters were written centuries after they were revealed there have been problems with the accuracy of dates and geographic locations. It is sad that Muslims have not devoted such a scientific pursuit of a book that they know has not changed a bit since the day it was revealed. Most of our study of the Quran has been more to do with jurisprudence and practices. We have completely ignored the fact that it is a book of history as well as science.

If there has been one question that has dogged most scholars and created the biggest rift between science and religion, it is the question of who was Adam and when did he live? If science says that humans evolved over hundreds of thousands of years till we got to our present stage and the early humans were little more than animals, then how do we explain the fact that Jewish, Christian and Islamic traditions say that Adam and Eve were the first humans on this planet and that Adam was the first Prophet? Based on our understanding of what a Prophet means we know that these are people who are guided by God to bring their people on the right path and that they posses knowledge which is unknown to the others. But science tells us that this level of consciousness was perhaps beyond the first man and woman. We know that science is accurate and we also believe that religion is true, but 2 truths cannot be opposite to each other. One would be the truth and the other false – at least that’s what conventional wisdom and logic dictates. Or is it??

We seem to treat the Wisdom of God very superficially. If the Quran is a book valid till eternity then it is logical to deduce that there will be layers of meanings which will be understood by generations of human beings as their knowledge expands. This simply means that it is impossible to think that people who lived a 1000 years ago would have read the Quran and were able to appreciate its historic and scientific aspects the same way that we do or that our future generations will. Perhaps we need to examine things from a different perspective. I recently came across the National Geographic’s Genographic project on the web https://genographic.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/lan/en/atlas.html . It shows the migration of humans across the globe over thousands of years. At the 60,000 years ago mark there was a little dot that said “Adam” and the explanation was fascinating.

It said “ Adam is the common male ancestor of every living man. He lived in Africa some 60,000 years ago which means that all humans lived in Africa until at least that time. Unlike his Biblical namesake he was not the only man alive in his era. Rather, he is unique because his descendants are the only ones to survive to the present day. It is important to note that Adam does not represent the first human. He is the coalescence point of all genetic diversity found in the world’s disparate peoples. Adam had human ancestors as well but we have no genetic evidence of them. The changes to the Y chromosome that we follow back through the generations to identify Adam end in the commonality of that shared ancestor”.

I found this information fascinating. Perhaps Adam was the first man not because he was the first homo sapien on this planet, but because he was the first human with the consciousness which we have come to accept as the hallmark of our species. Early homo sapiens by no means seem deserving of the title of ‘Ashraf ul Makhluqat’ or Supreme Creation, but perhaps Adam was the first human who was sent down to earth with this aspect of his character and who would then continue to pass it down to all humans and which is why God destroyed all genetic evidence of other humans of that era.

Quran does not really give any specific dates to various events recorded in its pages, perhaps because the time frames were too large for people of that day to comprehend or perhaps because it is meant to spur us on a voyage of discovery. My wish is that one day Muslims would again actively take on science and history as active pursuits like the earlier followers of Islam and some solid research is conducted free of dogmas, until then people like me will continue to put forward theories which are in part fact in part conjecture.

7 comments:

NVK Ashraf said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
NVK Ashraf said...

Your write up was indeed thought provoking. However, it appears to me that you are looking for an apt scientific explanation for a statement in the Qur'an (and the Bible) which you believe is correct. The theory of special creation is not unique to these two scriptures but something which has been mentioned in many civilizations or traditions. I am referring to the myth of creation with soil or clay. Please visit the section on "Creation of Man" in my article on "Genesis" (http://nvkashraf.blogspot.com/)

Ayesha said...

No need to question Quranic studies but this is very informative Thank you

Ayesha said...

Author can u explain how this may be true or not? With all due respect I believe u can make a different topic on Adam your site is very helpful to me to learn please put some Quran sayings in your paragraphs. Thank you Author.

Anonymous said...


Well I am Christian and as far as I know in Christianity Adam is never a prophet. Or perhaps I need more education. I checked the Bible but still Adam is no prophet. In quaran perhaps he is. In Bible, no.

sue pagan said...

This is so typical the bible says I was brought up a Christian and no in the bible Adam (peace be upon him) is not a prophet but what make the bible right the Quran has not been changed through centuries and while the bible says Jesus (peace be upon him) is the son of God (Allah) the Quran has a much more realistic truth he was a man who was a Prophet who taught the masses about Allah (God) I recently started to look at Islam and found it has a lot of truth and it is concise.

sue pagan said...

This is so typical the bible says I was brought up a Christian and no in the bible Adam (peace be upon him) is not a prophet but what make the bible right the Quran has not been changed through centuries and while the bible says Jesus (peace be upon him) is the son of God (Allah) the Quran has a much more realistic truth he was a man who was a Prophet who taught the masses about Allah (God) I recently started to look at Islam and found it has a lot of truth and it is concise.